Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add filters








Language
Year range
1.
Rev. méd. Chile ; 150(2): 172-177, feb. 2022. ilus, tab
Article in Spanish | LILACS | ID: biblio-1389638

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) represents 5-10% of urothelial carcinomas. It is managed with nephroureterectomy (NUR); however, kidney-sparing techniques are growingly used. AIM: To report the results of a 20-year series of NUR conducted in an academic center. Patients and Methods: Review of clinical and pathological characteristics of patients undergoing NUR between 1999 and 2020. Patients were followed for 63 months. Global survival curves (OS) and mortality predictors were established through Cox regression. RESULTS: We included 90 patients with a median age of 68 years undergoing NUR, of whom 68 (75%) had a pelvic tumor and 22 (25%) had a proximal ureteral tumor. A laparoscopic NUR was performed in 60 patients (66%). Thirty-three patients (37%) had tumors confined to the urothelium (pTa), penetrating the lamina propria (pT1) or carcinoma in situ (CIS), 10 patients (11%) had a tumor spreading to the muscle layer (pT2) and 47 (52%) had a tumor spreading to nearby organs (pT3 / T4). Average tumor size was 3.69 cm, nodal disease (pN) was present 12 patients (13%). Twelve patients (13%) received adjuvant chemotherapy. A higher mortality was observed among smokers (Hazard ratio (HR) 8.79, 95% confidence intervals (CI) 1.5-49.0, p = 0.01), patients with tumors classfied as pT≥ 2 (HR 1.09, 95% CI 0.01-1.0, p = 0.04) and those with tumors larger than 2 cm (HR 14.79, CI 95% 1.5-272, p = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Smoking patients, those with invasive tumors (T2-T4) and greater than 2 cm have higher mortality. Therefore, they should not be candidates for conservative management.


Subject(s)
Humans , Aged , Ureteral Neoplasms/surgery , Ureteral Neoplasms/pathology , Urinary Bladder Neoplasms/surgery , Carcinoma, Transitional Cell/surgery , Carcinoma, Transitional Cell/pathology , Kidney Neoplasms/surgery , Prognosis , Retrospective Studies , Nephroureterectomy
2.
ARS med. (Santiago, En línea) ; 43(2): 17-24, 2018. Tab
Article in Spanish | LILACS | ID: biblio-1022835

ABSTRACT

Establecer un score genético utilizando los polimorfismos de nucleótido único (SNPs) del gen que codifica para Ribonucleasa L (RNASEL)y regiones cromosómicas 8q24 y 17q12-24 en combinación con el antígeno específico de la próstata (PSA) para predecir la agresividad del cáncer de próstata (CaP). Pacientes y métodos: hombres con CaP tratados con prostatectomía radical. Se analizaron variables clínicas y patológicas: edad al diagnóstico, PSA al diagnóstico, el volumen tumoral (TV) y extensión extracapsular (ECE) según el TNM (tumour, node and metastasis) (ECE ≥T3) y score de Gleason. Desarrollamos un modelo de puntaje genético usando regresión logística multivariable. Resultados: se incluyeron 86 pacientes sometidos a prostatectomía radical. Edad promedio fue de 62 ± 7,5 años. El promedio de PSA fue de 11,3 ± 10,6 ng/mL. Treinta y un pacientes (36 por ciento) tuvieron ECE. La mediana del TV fue de 3,8 cc. Un PSA ≥ 10 ng/mL se asoció con una mayor tasa de ECE (p <0,05) y TV más alto (p = 0,032). En el análisis univariable, los pacientes con > 1 SNP tienen mayor riesgo de ECE que los pacientes con ≤ 1 SNP (42 por ciento vs. 10,5 por ciento, p = 0,01), y los pacientes con ≥ 3 SNP tienen más TV que los pacientes con <3 SNP (60 por ciento vs. 32 por ciento, p = 0,015). Se crearon dos modelos de riesgo usando el número de SNP y PSA ≥ o <10 ng/mL para predecir ECE (sensibilidad 67 por ciento y especificidad 84 por ciento) y TV (sensibilidad 59 por ciento y especificidad 70 por ciento). Conclusiones: El score genético presentado en este estudio es una herramienta novedosa para predecir indicadores de agresividad del CaP, como ECE y TV.(AU)


To establish a genetic score using SNPs (from RNAsel and chromosomal regions 8q24 and 17q12-24) in combination with Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA) at diagnosis to predict aggressiveness of PCa (tumor volume (TV) and extracapsular extension (ECE)). Patients and methods: Men with PCa diagnosed by needle biopsy and treated with radical prostatectomy (RP). Clinical and pathological variables such as age at diagnosis, PSA at diagnosis, TV, extension of tumor according TNM (ECE ≥T3) and Gleason score where analyzed. We developed a genetic score model using Multivariate Logistic Regression. Results: We included 86 patients who underwent RP. Mean age 62 ± 7.5 years. Mean PSA was 11.3 ± 10.6 ng/mL. Thirty-one patients (36 percent) had ECE. Median TV was 3.8 cc. PSA ≥ 10 ng/mL was associated with increased rate of ECE (p <0.05) and higher TV (p = 0.032). In univariate analysis, patients with more than 1 SNP had a greater risk of ECE than patients with ≤ 1 SNP (42 percent vs. 10.5 percent, p = 0.01), and patients with ≥ 3 risk SNPs had more TV than patients with <3 SNPs risk (60 percent vs. 32 percent, p = 0.015). Two models of risk using the number of SNPs and PSA ≥ or <10 ng/mL to predict ECE (sensitivity 67 percent and specificity 84 percent) and TV (sensitivity 59 percent and specificity 70 percent) were created. Conclusions: Genetic score usingdescribed SNPs and preoperative PSA can predict aggressiveness of PCa, which would be useful to define a management with more information at diagnosis especially in localized cancers.(AU)


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Adult , Middle Aged , Prostatic Neoplasms , Neoplasm Grading , Prostate-Specific Antigen , Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL